EDC 102 Final Project Rubric for Part I: Background Research
Name: Score:
Points awarded
(Points Possible) Criteria
0
(1) Research was summarized on the team's issue page.
2
(2) Five articles summarized, including:
1
• (1) At least one editorial or viewpoint essay. (From Opposing Viewpoints, CQ Researcher, or Op/Ed from reputable magazine or newspaper.)
1
• (1) At least one analysis article from a magazine or reputable newspaper.
1
• (1) At least two journal articles.
1
• (1) At least one related ERIC summary article or CQ Researcher Report.
3
(3) Article entries include a APA* citation, a summary paragraph, and a reaction paragraph.
9
Total Points
Note:
Extra points may be awarded for exceptional work.
Points may be deducted if page is not proofread.
Comments: You have done a very good job of researching your topic, and your annotated bibliography shows the work you have done. Too bad your partners have not helped more with this portion of the assignment. A suggestion: Do not start a description of an article with "it" or "this;" an article doesn't "talk about"anything - instead, an author writes, states, or suggests. EXAMPLE "Jones states that . . ." rather than "It talks about . . ."
EDC 102 Final Project Rubric for Part I: Background Research
Name:
Score:
Note:
Comments: You have done a very good job of researching your topic, and your annotated bibliography shows the work you have done. Too bad your partners have not helped more with this portion of the assignment. A suggestion: Do not start a description of an article with "it" or "this;" an article doesn't "talk about"anything - instead, an author writes, states, or suggests. EXAMPLE "Jones states that . . ." rather than "It talks about . . ."